Commit e8569423 authored by bahadircyildiz's avatar bahadircyildiz

FIX rref #5239, refs GH-92. Different approach on datepicker formatter implemented

parent ef55b1ae
...@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ angular.module('ulakbus.formService', ['ui.bootstrap']) ...@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ angular.module('ulakbus.formService', ['ui.bootstrap'])
try { try {
if (item.type === 'date') { if (item.type === 'date') {
scope.model[k][item.name] = generator.dateformatter(scope.model[k][item.name]); //scope.model[k][item.name] = generator.dateformatter(scope.model[k][item.name]);
} }
} catch (e) { } catch (e) {
$log.debug('Error: ', e.message); $log.debug('Error: ', e.message);
...@@ -549,7 +549,10 @@ angular.module('ulakbus.formService', ['ui.bootstrap']) ...@@ -549,7 +549,10 @@ angular.module('ulakbus.formService', ['ui.bootstrap'])
}, },
format: 'dd.MM.yyyy', format: 'dd.MM.yyyy',
onSelect: function () { onSelect: function () {
scope.model[k] = angular.copy(generator.dateformatter(scope.model[k])); var tempDate = angular.copy(scope.model[k]);
tempDate = Date.parse(tempDate, "dd.MM.yyyy");
scope.model[k] = tempDate;
//scope.model[k] = angular.copy(generator.dateformatter(scope.model[k]));
} }
}; };
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment